<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Apple iPad Rumor Is No More</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.novoparatus.com/2010/01/27/the-apple-ipad-rumor-is-no-more/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.novoparatus.com/2010/01/27/the-apple-ipad-rumor-is-no-more/</link>
	<description>novoparatus is a Technology Blog Featuring Industry News, How-tos, Reviews, and Culture. Based in Little Rock, AR.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 20 Jun 2010 00:05:44 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Micah</title>
		<link>http://www.novoparatus.com/2010/01/27/the-apple-ipad-rumor-is-no-more/comment-page-1/#comment-41</link>
		<dc:creator>Micah</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Feb 2010 02:15:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.novoparatus.com/?p=2083#comment-41</guid>
		<description>Nice work. I saw something online about the iPad, and figured you&#039;d have a piece of wonderfulness on it.

Yeah, I think Apple is definitely withholding so they can already have their next 6 generations of this thing mapped out. 

&quot;Pay us $499 for this one right now...be disappointed...then buy the 2G one in a year (for another $499) that has one of the features that this one should have had in the first place.&quot; Rinse &amp; repeat.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice work. I saw something online about the iPad, and figured you&#8217;d have a piece of wonderfulness on it.</p>
<p>Yeah, I think Apple is definitely withholding so they can already have their next 6 generations of this thing mapped out. </p>
<p>&#8220;Pay us $499 for this one right now&#8230;be disappointed&#8230;then buy the 2G one in a year (for another $499) that has one of the features that this one should have had in the first place.&#8221; Rinse &amp; repeat.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: novo</title>
		<link>http://www.novoparatus.com/2010/01/27/the-apple-ipad-rumor-is-no-more/comment-page-1/#comment-33</link>
		<dc:creator>novo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Jan 2010 18:06:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.novoparatus.com/?p=2083#comment-33</guid>
		<description>It was terribly rushed. Why on earth wouldn&#039;t they just use Mac OS X instead of a hybrid iPhone OS? There was so much speculation about the device, I think they had no choice but to spit something out. 

The 2nd generation iPad should blow this first one out of the water.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It was terribly rushed. Why on earth wouldn&#8217;t they just use Mac OS X instead of a hybrid iPhone OS? There was so much speculation about the device, I think they had no choice but to spit something out. </p>
<p>The 2nd generation iPad should blow this first one out of the water.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rickermortes</title>
		<link>http://www.novoparatus.com/2010/01/27/the-apple-ipad-rumor-is-no-more/comment-page-1/#comment-32</link>
		<dc:creator>rickermortes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Jan 2010 08:00:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.novoparatus.com/?p=2083#comment-32</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m a fan of Apple, but the iPad seems like a rushed idea. It&#039;s almost as if someone at Apple caught wind of the tablet rumors and rushed a product out just to take advantage of the free press.

No flash is a killer, being it is a mobile web/entertainment platform. No multitasking is rough but doesn&#039;t necessarily kill it for me as much as no Flash. I like the idea of the device being an e-reader, but LCD is harsh on the eyes where e-paper allows you to read as usual.

All-in-all, I like the idea of an Apple slate. I just think the execution is at best weak, at worst stupid.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m a fan of Apple, but the iPad seems like a rushed idea. It&#8217;s almost as if someone at Apple caught wind of the tablet rumors and rushed a product out just to take advantage of the free press.</p>
<p>No flash is a killer, being it is a mobile web/entertainment platform. No multitasking is rough but doesn&#8217;t necessarily kill it for me as much as no Flash. I like the idea of the device being an e-reader, but LCD is harsh on the eyes where e-paper allows you to read as usual.</p>
<p>All-in-all, I like the idea of an Apple slate. I just think the execution is at best weak, at worst stupid.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
